<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Puzzle-IT Technical Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Technical updates and comment from Puzzle-IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:35:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Set Authoritative External Time Server: Server 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/set-authoritative-external-time-server-server-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/set-authoritative-external-time-server-server-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Askham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Business Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2008 R2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ntp server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server 2008 time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w32tm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 2008 time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is your network slightly out of sync time-wise? Do you have to manually keep correcting the time on your DCs? Maybe you should run these commands to fix this: Firstly, find your PDC emulator by throwing up a command prompt &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/set-authoritative-external-time-server-server-2008/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your network slightly out of sync time-wise? Do you have to manually keep correcting the time on your DCs? Maybe you should run these commands to fix this:</p>
<p>Firstly, find your PDC emulator by throwing up a command prompt and running the command:<strong> <em>netdom /query fsmo</em></strong></p>
<p>Now in a command prompt on the PDC emulator, run: <em><strong>w32tm /config /syncfromflags:manual /manualpeerlist:0.uk.pool.ntp.org,1.uk.pool.ntp.org /update /reliable:yes</strong></em></p>
<p>Finally, we might as well force a sync: <em><strong>w32tm /resync</strong> </em>in a command prompt will do this for you.</p>
<p>Now wait a few minutes and your whole network should update to the new (correct) time.</p>
<p>Time issues: resolved.</p>
<p>- <a href="../../">James</a> | July 2011</p>
<p>Update: remember to elevate the command prompt &#8211; otherwise this won&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/set-authoritative-external-time-server-server-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sent Items for Mailboxes</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sent-items-for-mailboxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sent-items-for-mailboxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Askham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[additional mailboxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sent items]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outlook is a very good email client most of the time. Just occasionally though, it can be a bit frustrating. In the case of additional mailboxes, the frustration is all to do with where it stores sent items. By default &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sent-items-for-mailboxes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outlook is a very good email client most of the time. Just occasionally though, it can be a bit frustrating. In the case of additional mailboxes, the frustration is all to do with where it stores sent items.</p>
<p>By default Outlook will put things you send in your sent items, even if you&#8217;re sending via an additional mailbox. This is fine some of the time, but other times it would be great if Outlook could put things I send in the correct sent items&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-507"></span></p>
<p>In fact, this is nice and easy to sort out:</p>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;"><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953804/" target="_blank">Outlook 2003</a></span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;"><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/972148" target="_blank">Outlook 2007</a></span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">Outlook 2010: Rather than add the mailbox as an additional mailbox, add it as a new account instead.</span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;"><br />
</span></address>
<address></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">Note: If you&#8217;re pre-Outlook 2003, you need to consider upgrading if you want this functionality. This can&#8217;t be done via a tweak/configuration change.</span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">Second note: These tweaks have no effect on OWA. Sorry OWA users.</span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;"><br />
</span></address>
<address></address>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;">And that&#8217;s it for another week. See you again soon. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;">- <a href="../../">James</a> | February 2011</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sent-items-for-mailboxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SBS 2003 Exchange Store Limits</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sbs-2003-exchange-store-limits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sbs-2003-exchange-store-limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Askham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18GB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange SP2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[store limit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Running a Windows 2003 SBS server is quite a bit different from any other 2003-based server set-ups. Most changes have a knock-on effect somewhere else, and if you break something important &#8211; you can bring down quite a few services &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sbs-2003-exchange-store-limits/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running a Windows 2003 SBS server is quite a bit different from any other 2003-based server set-ups. Most changes have a knock-on effect somewhere else, and if you break something important &#8211; you can bring down quite a few services in one swoop.</p>
<p>Assuming you&#8217;ve already patched Exchange to SP2, one of the next things to consider doing is to increase the soft-limit for the private Exchange store. This is set to 18GB by default (but will let you go up to about 19-20GB before dismounting), but can be increased to up to 75GB. I usually set it to around 50GB, as if it hits this limit you&#8217;ve got ample time to get people to archive a few emails.</p>
<p>Remember, if you hit this soft-limit &#8211; the mailbox store will automatically dismount and can&#8217;t be remounted until you make this change.</p>
<p>To set the limit, do the following:</p>
<p><span id="more-501"></span></p>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">1) Open regedit</span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">2) Navigate to HKLM &gt; Systems &gt; CurrentControlSet &gt; Services &gt; MSExchangeIS &gt; *yourservername* &gt; Private-*GUID*</span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">3) Create a new DWORD value called </span>Database Size Limit in Gb <span style="font-style: normal;">(if this already exists, and is set below 75 &#8211; you can just increase it)</span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">4)  Edit the value of this to be anything between 18 and 75 (make sure you set it to decimal, not hex)</span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">5) OK out and close regedit</span></address>
<address><span style="font-style: normal;">6) Restart the Information Store service when convenient. </span></address>
<p>That&#8217;s it! All finished. Exchange is happy, you&#8217;re happy and most importantly the client will be happy.</p>
<p>Tune in next time for more IT blogging.</p>
<p>- <a href="../../">James</a> | January 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sbs-2003-exchange-store-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office 2010: Unsaved File Recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/office-2010-unsaved-file-recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/office-2010-unsaved-file-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Askham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Office 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsaved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsaved file recovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you accidently close Word without saving? Do you wish that you&#8217;d saved that file, or even pray that you could get it back? Well luckily for you, Office 2010 keeps unsaved documents for a short while. To open/recover one &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/office-2010-unsaved-file-recovery/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you accidently close Word without saving? Do you wish that you&#8217;d saved that file, or even pray that you could get it back?</p>
<p>Well luckily for you, Office 2010 keeps unsaved documents for a short while. To open/recover one of these documents, simply open the relevant program (Word or Excel are probably the most common) and head into the <em>File </em>menu. Click on the <em>Recent </em>side tab and choose the option to recover unsaved document (or workbook/presentation) at the bottom right. Then choose the unsaved item to recover.</p>
<p>Viola! It&#8217;s as easy as that.</p>
<p>Tune in next week for more IT blogging.</p>
<p>- <a href="../../">James</a> | January 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/office-2010-unsaved-file-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NTLM vs. Basic &#124; Outlook Anywhere</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/ntlm-vs-basic-outlook-anywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/ntlm-vs-basic-outlook-anywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Askham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook anywhere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPC over HTTPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I’m often asked what the best way to configure Outlook Anywhere is, NTLM or Basic authentication (in fact, you can configure both – but I don’t recommend that). To be honest, I prefer NTLM authentication most of the time. &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/ntlm-vs-basic-outlook-anywhere/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I’m often asked what the best way to configure Outlook Anywhere is, NTLM or Basic authentication (in fact, you can configure both – but I don’t recommend that).</p>
<p>To be honest, I prefer NTLM authentication most of the time. NTLM doesn’t require users to enter a username/password to connect to Exchange (as they can pass-through with the OS credentials), and it never sends the password in clear text – which I also like (in fairness, as everything is handled over SSL this isn’t as bad as it sounds).</p>
<p>The one time I do use Basic is if my client <em>wants</em> to enter a password to use email, perhaps so that they feel more secure.</p>
<p>Whatever the reason, both are decent – but I’ll stick to NTLM for my deployments.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/">James</a> | January 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/ntlm-vs-basic-outlook-anywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor SSD Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/poor-ssd-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/poor-ssd-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>puzzleit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puzzleituk.wordpress.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you want to get yourself a shiny new SSD drive, do you? But wait a second, which one do you buy? What should you look for? Well luckily for you, Dr. James is here to help you out. Controllers &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/poor-ssd-performance/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you want to get yourself a shiny new SSD drive, do you? But wait a second, which one do you buy? What should you look for? Well luckily for you, Dr. James is here to help you out.</p>
<p><strong>Controllers matter</strong></p>
<p>First things first, hopefully you&#8217;ve got yourself an SSD based on a good controller, which essentially links the I/O to the flash memory. I&#8217;ve used SSDs based on Marvell (Crucial C300) and Sandforce (OCZ Vertex II) controllers, which both offer excellent performance. If you get a poor controller, it&#8217;s likely that you&#8217;ll never realise the full speed boost that an SSD can offer.</p>
<p><span id="more-489"></span><strong>TRIM</strong></p>
<p>Next, make sure your SSD supports TRIM and that you have an operating system that does too (Windows 7 is a good shout). TRIM addresses an issue with deleted files being left intact on the SSD, which means that when a future write occurs the drive has to erase before it can write. With TRIM enabled, this erasing is done as part of a automated deletion system &#8211; so you don&#8217;t suffer future performance issues.</p>
<p><strong>Firmware &gt; Software</strong></p>
<p>Most SSD manufacturers are constantly releasing updates to the low-level software that runs on your drive. This is the firmware, and it&#8217;s very important to update it to the latest version before you start installing things on your drive. You may also want to update it in the future, as it more offer better performance &#8211; but the easiest time to do it is before you&#8217;ve done anything with the drive (as later updates can require a reformat/rebuild).</p>
<p><strong>Tweak yo&#8217; SSD</strong></p>
<p>Windows 7 doesn&#8217;t automatically tweak itself for SSD drives. In fact, quite a lot of tweaks can be made to speed up the experience. Luckily, if you head over <a title="SSD Tweaker by elpam.soft" href="http://elpamsoft.com/Default.aspx" target="_blank">here</a> and download the SSD tweaker application &#8211; you can do all the important tweaks in a couple of easy steps. Simply install the program, run it and choose &#8220;auto-tweak&#8221;. Then restart your computer. See? Nice and easy, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p><strong>Goodbye </strong><strong>defragmenting</strong></p>
<p>SSD drives operate in a totally different way to traditional hard disks. Therefore, they don&#8217;t need to be defragmented. Never. Not even once. Surely it&#8217;s worth going SSD just for this feature alone?</p>
<p><strong>SSDs are awesome</strong></p>
<p>So that&#8217;s it really. Get a good controller, use TRIM, don&#8217;t defrag and tweak your system. Do all of these things, and buying an SSD drive is possibly the best device that you&#8217;ll have in your computer. It&#8217;s fast, maintenance-free and getting more affordable all the time. In fact, why aren&#8217;t you buying an SSD now? Seriously, it&#8217;s time to go shopping. Crucial 128GB C300 is less than £200 right now. What time is it? It&#8217;s SSD time!</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/">James</a> | Dec 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/poor-ssd-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internal DNS Configuration</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/internal-dns-configuration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/internal-dns-configuration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>puzzleit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal DNS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puzzleituk.wordpress.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting your internal SBS DNS configuration right is an easy thing to do, especially when the most common error that I see is badly configured zones &#8211; which are easy to fix. So let&#8217;s say that your company&#8217;s internal domain &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/internal-dns-configuration/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting your internal SBS DNS configuration right is an easy thing to do, especially when the most common error that I see is badly configured zones &#8211; which are easy to fix.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s say that your company&#8217;s internal domain name is company.local and their external domain name is company.co.uk. Now <em>most</em> people would create an ADi primary lookup zone for all of company.co.uk and then create A records for each host they want, so you end up with hosts like webmail.company.co.uk and www.company.co.uk all under this one zone.</p>
<p>Instead of this, why not create individual zones for each of your A records? So for example: webmail.company.co.uk should be its own primary zone (not ADi) rather than an A record in the company.co.uk domain.</p>
<p>In most of my deployments, I have about five manually created zones that serve Exchange requests (autodiscover and email) and remote access (SSTP and the like). This makes it easy to make changes to DNS, and also means that I never have to update records for external resources (www for example).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all for this week. Have a lovely Christmas and see you in the New Year.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/">James</a> | Dec 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/internal-dns-configuration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SLI Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sli-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sli-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>puzzleit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphics Cards - Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia SLI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puzzleituk.wordpress.com/?p=482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you just purchased SLI? Are you getting weird artifacts appearing on the screen, or is something else random happening? Make sure you&#8217;ve completed the list below, to ensure your SLI is happy&#8230; 1) Make sure your PSU is powerful &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sli-issues/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you just purchased SLI?</p>
<p>Are you getting weird artifacts appearing on the screen, or is something else random happening?</p>
<p>Make sure you&#8217;ve completed the list below, to ensure your SLI is happy&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-482"></span></p>
<p><img title="More..." src="../wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>1) Make sure your PSU is powerful enough to run both cards. If you&#8217;re  trying to run SLI on a cheap 400W PSU, you&#8217;re going to have issues. At this point, get yourself a decent 600-700W one.</p>
<p>2) Make sure you&#8217;ve connected all the required power cables to your two cards.</p>
<p>3) Ensure the SLI bridge is connected OK.</p>
<p>4) Use the latest Nvidia drivers (not the ones that come with the CD).</p>
<p>5) Certain motherboards require you to actually enable SLI on the  board. My old ASUS board required me to invert a little board on the  motherboard, otherwise SLI simply wouldn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>6) If you&#8217;re still getting problems, flash your BIOS to the latest  version. This can usually be downloaded from the website of your  motherboard manufacturer.</p>
<p>*WARNING* BIOS FLASHING CAN BE RISKY, IF IN ANY DOUBT PLEASE SPEAK TO SOMEONE WHO KNOWS HOW TO DO IT. *END WARNING*</p>
<p>7) If you are STILL having issues after the above, you&#8217;ve probably  got either an issue with heat OR your motherboard is doing something it shouldn&#8217;t . Either way, you&#8217;ll probably need more help than the t&#8217;internet  can provide. Maybe give <a title="Puzzle-IT Consultancy" href="www.puzzle-it.co.uk" target="_blank">Puzzle-IT</a> a ring?</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/">James</a> | Dec 2010</p>
<p>P.S. Most of the above will work for ATI&#8217;s Crossfire too, just change  anything that says &#8220;Nvidia&#8221; or &#8220;SLI&#8221; for &#8220;ATI&#8221; or &#8220;Crossfire&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/sli-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>puzzleit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome vs Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox noscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoScript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puzzleituk.wordpress.com/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past three years Firefox has been my default browser. I like the speed that I can navigate the web, the extra items you can add in and some of the features they&#8217;ve added over the years (including the &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/google-chrome/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past three years Firefox has been my default browser. I like the speed that I can navigate the web, the extra items you can add in and some of the features they&#8217;ve added over the years (including the isolation of plug-ins, like Adobe Flash). On any and all of my computers, Firefox is still the king of browsers. It even continues to enjoy its dominant position on my Taskbar and Start Menu.</p>
<p>However, for a while now it&#8217;s had a challenger to the throne&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-473"></span></p>
<p><strong>Google Chrome</strong></p>
<p>Google Chrome sits next to Firefox on the Taskbar, below it on the Start Menu and is probably open just as often. Recently, I even noticed that I often load Google Chrome <em>before </em>Firefox.</p>
<p>So why do I like Google Chrome so much?</p>
<p><strong>Speed</strong></p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s fast. Really fast. I&#8217;m currently working on a laptop with an SSD, so most programs load quickly &#8211; but Chrome is instant. Firefox takes a second or two, IE takes about the same but Chrome just appears. I like that. If I want to check the news (in my case mainly IT related), I want to be in and out quickly. Chrome facilitates this. It doesn&#8217;t badger me for updates, it just loads. That&#8217;s genius.</p>
<p><strong>Features</strong></p>
<p>Chrome seems to get the best features more quickly than other browsers. Right now, I&#8217;m running Chrome 8 and they&#8217;ve added some fantastic new features. Going into <em>about:flags </em>allows me to enable side tabs, options in a tab, instant URL loading (as I type), GPU acceleration and to be honest lots of features that I don&#8217;t need yet. The hybrid URL/search bar at the top is probably my favourite overall feature of Chrome. Fast and easy, it&#8217;s something that should probably have appeared in other browsers years ago.</p>
<p><strong>Less is more</strong></p>
<p>The streamlined interface is also perfect for me. I don&#8217;t need lots of icons and links. I am a man of the command line and short-cut keys. Honestly, I often consider using the mouse a defeat. The keyboard is my kingdom, and Chrome understands that. It doesn&#8217;t clutter up my display with lots of tool bars and useless paraphernalia. It&#8217;s right to the point. I want to surf the interwebs. That is all.</p>
<p><strong>Why Firefox?</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>So I suppose the question is why does Firefox still maintain its winning position? Why hasn&#8217;t Chrome usurped it completely? Well, I think for everyday use Chrome probably has stolen the crown. When I turn on my computer in the morning, the first foreground item that I load is Chrome. It&#8217;s also my browser of choice for any service that I already trust. In fact, I&#8217;m often in Chrome without Firefox being open at all. Whole web sessions fly by without Firefox getting a look-in.</p>
<p>However, where Firefox is still important is for websites that I do <strong>not </strong>trust, or haven&#8217;t been to before, or even sites that I <em>know</em> have some undesirable components. You see, Firefox has NoScript, which is an excellent little script blocking add-in. Its standard blocking ability is fantastic, but it also protects against XSS vulnerabilities and maintains a huge white-list of safe domains, which makes it even more effective for day-to-day use. So if I&#8217;m going to a website for the first time, I&#8217;ll always use Firefox.</p>
<p>I suppose the only question that remains is when will I move to Chrome full time. Well, if NoScript ever appeared on Chrome I think I&#8217;d switch immediately. Unfortunately, that probably won&#8217;t happen in the near-future, which unfortunately for Chrome means that I can&#8217;t make the full switch just yet. Firefox&#8217;s future on my computers has been secured not by it&#8217;s own brilliance, but by a single add-in. And that should worry Mozilla. A lot.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/">James</a> | Dec 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slow Wireless on Dell Laptops</title>
		<link>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/slow-wireless-on-dell-laptops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/slow-wireless-on-dell-laptops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>puzzleit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell wifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DW1501]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DW1501 slow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor performance DW1501]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow dell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksgetthegirls.wordpress.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re running a Dell laptop with the DW1501 wireless adapter, you may find that wireless is slow. Really, really slow. I had this problem the other day, and tried everything to sort it out. Eventually, I went through the settings &#8230; <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/slow-wireless-on-dell-laptops/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re running a Dell laptop with the DW1501 wireless adapter, you may find that wireless is slow.</p>
<p>Really, really slow.</p>
<p>I had this problem the other day, and tried everything to sort it out. Eventually, I went through the settings for the WLAN card itself, and found that all my performance woes were resolved by changing the BSS mode from 802.11n to 802.11g .</p>
<p>Now it runs brilliantly.</p>
<p>Awesome to the max.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/">James</a> | Nov 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puzzle-it.co.uk/blog/slow-wireless-on-dell-laptops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

